Posts Tagged ‘calf nutrition’
Happy Calves Drinking
The 2001 study done by Thomas et. al. (App. Anim. Sci., 74: 165-173) concluded that significant vocalization differences existed between groups of calves depending on how often, and how much they were fed. This study highlights the satiation of calves with increased feeding rates. If a producer notices noisy calves, feeding schedules should be one of the first places he/she looks.
Today we have a wide range of milk replacer formulations to select from to ensure we meet the needs of the young calf. Feeding programs have been developed to maximize growth and development of the young calf prior to weaning. This, followed by enhanced grain and forage feeding programs, can ultimately maximize growth and development.
What are the pay-offs for sound calf nutrition that starts at DAY 1?
- maximizing lean muscle tissue deposition
- encouraging earlier breeding size and optimal weight
- earlier lactation and
- more milk over the lifetime of the animal
Developmental Research – Grain-fed Veal Programs
Ontario and Quebec dairy herds produce approximately 400,000 male calves annually. These calves are destined for several hundred veal producers.The goal of grain fed veal producers is to achieve the desired finish at the desired weight and age. The market-ready calf is typically 250-295kg at an age of 25-30 weeks. Finished average daily gains should be 1.13kg or better and feed conversion should be 3.5-4.0 kg per kg of live-weight gain.
The Holstein calf has an ability to grow rapidly and genetics, management, environment and nutrition dictate this growth.
NRC 2001 – major change is to provide the foundation to think of calves as we have of older animals, in that nutrient requirements are not static but depend on desired rate of gain, body size and environment. The new NRC considers the approach that calf nutrition is dynamic, just as for older cattle. In other words, the product-orientated ‘one size fits all’ mentality of calf raising, (i.e. a single milk replacer formulation or feeding regime is assumed adequate for all calves) gives way to calculating requirements for growth and health and then designing diets to meet those requirements.
Conventional calf feeding offers milk replacer, of 20% protein and 20% fat, at approximately 400-450g/d. Using the NRC 2001, this does not provide sufficient energy to meet high growth requirements of grain-fed veal calves. While energy intake is the main driver of bodyweight gain, protein intake can influence both BWG and its composition.
e.g.
| NRC ration calculations | 40kg calf at 10oC | 50kg calf at 10oC | |||
| Calf milk replacer | Grober VG | Conventional 20/20 | Grober VG | Conventional 20/20 | Conventional +200g starter |
| Milk replacer (l/d) | 4 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
| Intake (g/d) | 500 | 440 | 750 | 440 | 660 |
| Energy allowable gain (g/d) | 310 | 220 | 500 | 100 | 280 |
| Protein allowable gain (g/d) | 300 | 240 | 500 | 220 | 300 |
| Feed efficiency (gain:feed) | 0.60 | 0.50 | 0.67 | 0.50 | 0.42 |
The nutritional balance of energy, protein and essential vitamins and minerals for very young calves to encourage high DM intakes cannot be achieved from concentrates or forages because of the limitations in: early dry-feed intake, stomach capacity, rumen development, and lower digestibility of concentrate ingredients.
(Leadley and Sojda, 1996.) To help overcome the weaning growth depression, it is suggested that milk feeding be increased during the first 3-4 weeks of life, followed by restricted allowances during the next 1-2 weeks to encourage development of solid feed intake.
Increasing milk intake early→increase growth→ more vigorous calves→ smoother weaning transition→ less stress and growth depression.
With the Grober VG feeding program, the milk replacer is designed to meet the correct nutrient balance for high growth rates of young veal calves, resulting in healthier and well-proportioned calves that can achieve their production goals with a high efficiency.
Andre Roy MSc.
Sally Charlton BSc. (Hons)
April 2003
Developmental Research – enhanced feeding programs
Numerous studies, back as far as 1968, have examined the effects of feeding increased rates of milk or milk replacer to young calves. Recent developments in this area of heifer rearing have led to enhanced feeding programs.
Conventional calf feeding offers milk replacer, of 18-22% protein and 15-22% fat, at approximately 500g/d. This can support approx. 400g/d live-weight gain (LWG). For dairy replacement heifers of high genetic potential, this is not sufficient to meet optimum growth potential. Recent studies have explored the responses to feeding a higher level of milk replacer (energy intake) with a change in milk replacer composition (protein concentration and energy source). While energy intake is the main driver of bodyweight gain, protein intake can influence both BWG and its composition.
The strategy of lower intakes has typically been a management decision, not necessarily geared to growth potential. The new ‘enhanced’ growth program supports higher rates of feeding that are closer to ad lib feeding systems and thus could be more ‘biologically normal growth’. This growth is aimed at skeleton and muscle, resulting in tall heifers compared to fat heifers.
Increasing the feeding rate of a milk replacer with adequate protein has pronounced effects on growth rate and feed efficiency.
Barlett et al, Univ. of Illinois J.Dairy Sci. Vol.85, suppl. 1
| Feed intake—–> | 10%BW (conventional) | 14%BW (Enhanced) | 18%BW (ad lib) |
| MR intake kgDM/d | 0.65 | 0.99 | 1.28 |
| Av.gain g/d | 360 | 700 | 1030 |
| Gain: feed | 0.55 | 0.71 | 0.81 |
| Urea in plasma mg/dl | 11.6 | 8.9 | 8.3 |
Using a 4,565 Mcal/kg milk replacer of 25% CP/ 17%fat with no calf starter for 5 week period
Tikofsky et al., 2001- Body composition can be altered by the source of energy. High lactose/low fat concentrations in milk replacer favours lower fat deposition.
Hill et al (2001) Substitution rate of milk replacer for dry starter feed is lower for high protein/low fat/high lactose milk replacers compared with conventional milk replacers.
Cornell researchers concluded that, with higher protein levels, a minimum 15% fat could be adequate to maintain lean growth. However, allowances must be made for cold environment conditions. Too low a fat level reduces the stimulatory effect of fat on pancreatic enzyme secretion, so that protein digestion may be impaired.
NRC 2001 – major change is to provide the foundation to think of calves as we have of older animals, in that nutrient requirements are not static but depend on desired rate of gain, body size and environment. The new NRC considers the approach that calf nutrition is dynamic, just as for older cattle. In other words, the product-orientated ‘one size fits all’ mentality of calf raising, (i.e. a single milk replacer formulation or feeding regime is assumed adequate for all calves) gives way to calculating requirements for growth and health and then designing diets to meet those requirements.
Drackley (2001) 26% CP milk replacer maximized growth rate with minimal fat deposition. Research showed that whilst energy intake is the main driver of BWG, protein intake could influence both BWG and the composition of BWG. Drackley, (2000) identified three possible long-term effects of calf growth and development: milk production potential, metabolic imprinting and health and immune status.

Whole milk (Holstein) contains 29-30% fat and 25-26% protein on a dry solids basis.
Diaz et al. (2001) -Using a 30% CP milk replacer showed, that as feeding level increased from 14 to 26 g milk replacer DM/kg bodyweight/day, bodyweight gain and fat content of gain increased but with no reduction in protein content of BW.

With the enhanced feeding program, the milk replacer is designed to meet the correct nutrient balance for high growth rates and intakes in heifers, resulting in taller and well-proportioned heifers that can enter the milk herd earlier and have a higher milk production potential.
Foldager et al, 1997, 48th EAAP Annual Meeting.
Calf Milk Intake and Lactation Yield (Post weaning growth: 0.55 to 0.65kg/d to calving)
| Conventional | Enhanced | Maternal | |
| Gain (g/d) (0-42d) | 650 | 960 | 850 |
| Calving weight (kg) | 496 | 491 | 509 |
| Energy corrected milk kg/d | 25.5 | 27.1 | 27.3 |
| 305d difference (kg) | 488 | 549 |
The concept is to feed heifers to attain a pre-selected or target weight at a given age to achieve optimum first lactation performance while controlling the costs of rearing replacements. Gaining benefit from enhanced early nutrition requires integration with the entire heifer-rearing program.
Andre Roy MSc.
Sally Charlton BSc. (Hons)
April 2003