Posts Tagged ‘calf milk feeders’
Automatic Calf Feeders and Group Housing
Principles and Experience
Introduction
Producers have traditionally raised calves in individual pens or hutches. This rearing system has had advantages of individual feeding, observation and reduced risk of cross-contamination. It is however, still labour intensive. Dairy cattle are naturally group-living animals. Group-housed calves can enjoy an early social interaction and learn to understand group behaviour. Research is now proving that well-managed group housed calf rearing systems can provide advantages for both calves and producers.
Automatic feeding systems for group housing
Group housing often requires intensive management. In non-automated group housing individual intake is difficult to monitor. Moreover, sub-clinical or ill calves may be challenging to identify and therefore treat appropriately.
The new generation of automatic feeding systems (like the Förster-Technik model sold through DeLaval, Lely and Westfalia/GEA) can be easily programmed to effectively feed and monitor calves on an individual basis. There is software available to accumulate a significant amount of information and provide detailed data analysis of individual calves and/or the group for high management control with low labour requirements. An example of data collected includes daily milk replacer intake and number of visits to the feeder. Alarms will be triggered when deviations occur. Individual medication, electrolyte/additive administration programs are also available options.
Feeding management
In conventional feeding by pail, calves are fed limited amounts of milk replacer (i.e.) 2-3 litres of milk replacer twice a day, the equivalent of 500-900g of solids. For optimal heifer growth and development calf feeding recommendations have increased to 8-10 liters/day, the equivalent of 1200-1500g of solids, sometimes even more.
The advantages of feeding calves more milk are widely published. Areas studied include calf growth, height, starter consumption, medication use/costs, time management, and the increased output of milk during the first lactation (references available upon request). These published advantages examine the economic impacts of feeding more milk replacer.
Grober Nutrition, based in Cambridge, Ontario is working in partnership with Förster-Technik, a world leader in automatic calf feeding, to establish further on-farm practice and benefits. The concept of smaller meals being offered more frequently could lead to improved digestion and may also aid in the prevention of severe scouring.
Group feeding experience
Grober Nutrition has been evaluating group housing systems for over 20 years and have more recently collated data from CY Heifer Farms (Elba, N.Y.) and the Grober Young Animal Development Centre (GYADC) (Woodstock, Ont.). The trials were set up to examine and quantify the growth, development, medication usage rate and economics of
feeding the same amount of milk to group fed calves compared with individually fed calves. The first data set from CY Farms was evaluated based on 582 calves and concluded no significant difference in live weight and growth rate between the two feeding practices. Group fed calves, however, showed a significantly lower medication cost(P<0.05) during the CY Farms trial period compared to individually fed calves. Computer data analysis allowed for earlier detection of illness and labour was reduced by 52%.
The Grober Young Animal Development Centre in Woodstock, Ontario, enables Grober to compare both individual and group housing methods under one roof. This means that nutrition programs, calf-rearing technologies and other calf products can be examined simultaneously under both management systems.
Recent data from the Grober Centre shows that calves in groups exceeded average daily gains compared to individually housed calves starting week 5 and continuing past weaning (see Table 1).
Table 1. Average Daily Gain (ADG) of calves receiving 6L/day of milk replacer as compared between groups and individual pens. (All values reported in kg/day).
| Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 5 | Week 6 | Week 7 | Week 8 | Week 9 | Week 10 | |
| Group | 0.361 | 0.423 | 0.501 | 0.707 | 0.448 | 0.644 | 1.03 | 0.988 | 1.23 |
| Individual | 0.378 | 0.673 | 0.668 | 0.552 | 0.503 | 0.742 | 0.835 | 0.502 | 0.597 |
blue, red columns with different superscripts are significantly different at p<0.05
While ADG often fluctuates due to environmental and health influences there was no significant difference in average body weight until weaning (week 7). Throughout weaning and post-weaning, calves in group housing achieved a significantly higher average body weight (see Figure 1.
Improved gains may be attributed to the significant increase (P< 0.05) in starter intake from automatic grain feeders prior to weaning for the group fed calves. However, during weaning, calves in individual pens achieved similar calf starter intake compared to group housed calves.
Group Housing & Health
There are perceived health concerns when calves have nose-to-tail contact. Automatic calf feeding machines are a tool for early detection of illness.
Grober Nutrition assessed the cost of medication to evaluate whether group housed calves are more likely to require therapeutic intervention (see Figure 2).
The data illustrates that individual calves suffered significantly more illness early on (i.e. scours).
During week 4, a significant difference in cost was associated with group calves (respiratory illness). Overall, group fed calves showed a significantly lower medication cost compared to individually fed calves. Age, body weight and a higher plane of nutrition may have accounted for more moderate medication use and cost.
Group Housing Considerations
Selecting calves for group housing with automation requires a thrifty calf with a strong suckling reflex. The calf manager should group calves of similar age and body weight. Group housing of calves has many time and labour saving advantages. It provides improved access to space, allowing for more vigorous activity, and with automation, improves feed consistency and number of feeds.
Group housing can facilitate earlier socialization. Moreover, there may be minimization of stress associated with changes in feed and environment post-weaning for calves.
For more details please contact Grober Nutrition at www.grobernutrition.com or toll free 1-800-265-7863
request more info about this by email
Grober Contacts
|
|
|
|
Tips for feeding Kid Goats
Grober Nutrition® & Förster-Technik® announce partnership
Grober Nutrition (Cambridge, Ontario), the leader in young animal nutrition and Förster-Technik (Engen, Germany), the world’s largest manufacturer of automatic calf feeders announce a technical partnership.

left to right
Mike Fortuna (CFO, Grober Nutrition), Thomas Förster (CEO/Managing Director, Förster Technik), Jan Ziemerink (Manager of Automation Services, Grober Nutrition), Markus Förster (CEO/Managing Director, Finance), Markus Kack (Research & Development, Förster Technik), Heather Copland (Marketing & Communications Manager, Grober Nutrition), Jerry Bartelse (CEO/President, Grober Nutrition)
Effective April 1, 2008, Grober Nutrition and Förster-Technik will be working in collaboration to support and promote the use of automatic calf feeders to the Canadian dairy farmer.
Grober’s farming division (Delft Blue Farms) was the first North American farm to utilize the Specialist heavy-duty calf feeder from Förster. Grober and Förster have continued to work together closely over the past 10 years.
While Förster is the world’s largest manufacturer of automatic calf feeders, the North American market place is only recently fully-realizing the value that automation plays at the dairy farm.
Grober will serve as Förster-Technik’s North American anchor for technical expertise. Grober’s 30-plus years’ experience in formulating outstanding milk replacers combined with their expertise in raising over 200,000 calves/year will provide the market with a needed-resource to support and promote the use of automatic calf feeders.
“Certainly, our vast experience using the Förster automatic calf feeders, and designing milk replacer formulas that operate optimally through these machines, has provided us with a unique experience to combine nutrition, expertise in calf husbandry, and technical advice to the marketplace.” says Jerry Bartelse, President and owner of Grober Nutrition.
Thomas Förster, CEO and Managing Director, agrees. “Grober has a long and proven track record in group housing for calves, a system state-of-the-art in Europe but not yet across North America. Also we are sure that the dairy farmer will be successful with Grober’s milk replacer in our calf feeders to save labor and have faster growing animals. Together with Grober’s practical support in Canada this is a win-win situation for everyone.”

Grober Nutrition will support the leading suppliers of milking equipment (DeLaval, WestfaliaSurge, Lely) who distribute, sell and service the Förster-Technik automatic calf feeders. Grober will also provide support to the dairy nutrition companies for whom they make private label milk replacer. Grober will provide feeding schedules, advice on machine-housing as well as training on machine operation. Grober will also support operation, calibration, and function of machines at the dairy farm level through the equipment companies and Grober’s dairy nutrition customers. Sales, service and installation will remain under the milking equipment company’s responsibility.
With advancements in technology come opportunities. And while the Förster-Technik machines are user-friendly, technical and value-added support must be available.
Jan Ziemerink, Manager of Automation Services, Grober Inc., will be the contact for the Grober/Förster partnership. He can be reached at jziemerink@grober.com or 519-622-2500 x 315 (office), 519-239-9756 (cell)
For more information pertaining to this News Release, please contact:
Contact: Heather Copland
Marketing & Communications Manager
Grober Nutrition
Tel: 800-265-7863 x 240
Email: hcopland@grober.com

Heather Copland, MSc.
Kathleen Shore
Anton Reijmers
Jan Ziemerink